Now
A Few Clouds
54°
High
70°
Low
49°

Hagel calls for bipartisan foreign policy

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY DON WALTON / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Jul 24, 2008 - 04:37:38 pm CDT

Sen. Chuck Hagel said Thursday he and presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama fundamentally agree on foreign policy.

“We generally agree about (policy in) Iraq and Afghanistan,” the Republican senator said during a telephone interview from Washington following his trip to the Mideast with Obama.

Both agree on the need for diplomatic talks with Iran and the importance of active U.S. engagement in seeking an Israeli-Palestinian settlement, Hagel said.

Story Photo
U.S. Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb.

The United States needs to “put some energy into helping resolve” the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, he said.

“It’s very much at the core of so much of the problem in the Middle East,” he said.

“I think (Obama) would make that a priority of his administration” if he’s elected, Hagel said.

What the next president needs to do, Hagel said, is forge a bipartisan foreign policy that will restore America’s prestige and influence in the world.

“We’re in terrible trouble in the world,” Hagel earlier told a telephone news conference.

“We need to reintroduce ourselves to the world” in a manner that re-establishes confidence, credibility and trust in U.S. leadership, he said.

Hagel returned to Washington this week from a congressional trip to Iraq and Afghanistan with Obama and Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I.

A Republican member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Hagel said he believes it was important to have a bipartisan presence on the tour.

Congressional trips are traditionally bipartisan, he said.

Hagel said he did not “ask permission” from his Republican colleagues to join Obama on the high-profile trip.

Either presumptive Republican nominee John McCain or Obama will be chosen to “govern this country and lead the world,” he said, and both need bipartisan cooperation to succeed.

Despite their long and deep friendship, Hagel has not endorsed McCain, a strong supporter of the war in Iraq and hardline opponent of direct U.S. negotiations with Iran.

Hagel has been the most outspoken Republican congressional critic of Iraq war policy, warned long ago about the loss of U.S. focus in Afghanistan and repeatedly has urged the Bush administration to be more energetic in helping resolve the Israeli-Palestinian dispute.  He has argued for diplomatic engagement with Iran and Syria for some time.

“We’re not going to unwind all the bad decisions made in Afghanistan and Iraq,” Hagel said.

“We’re in a mess.  We’ve got a huge problem and we’ve got to work our way out of this in a responsible way.”

Hagel supports a phased withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq and opposes establishment of permanent U.S. military bases in that country.

“We need more military presence in Afghanistan,” he said.  That translates into at least two additional U.S. combat brigades, he said.

Hagel dodged questions about Obama’s performance during the trip, except to suggest the Illinois senator gave “a good, thoughtful statement” about conditions in Iraq and Afghanistan during a joint news conference in Jordan.

“I think all three of us have a pretty solid grasp on what the reality is there,” he said.

Hagel declined to assess how hours of conversation with Obama during the trip may have allowed him to take a better measure of the man.

Reach Don Walton at 473-7248 or at dwalton@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Dirty Word wrote on July 24, 2008 12:43 pm:
" Bipartisan is a dirty word in today's American politics. "

DOC wrote on July 24, 2008 1:15 pm:
" Okay Class, why is Chuck looking so blue? Probably cause he sees history repeating itself and has decided to give up. Remember Viet Nam, where Chuck fought? Remember that the congress wouldn't let us win the war? Where we snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. He sees, how the congress wants to do the same thing again and he's decided to join them. He wants to be on the winning side with a group that is doing everything possible to help us surrender to a 3rd rate power. He's hooked up with Obama who has said in his book, when push comes to shove, he'll side with the muslims. That ought to be comforting to Israel and the rest of us that remember 9/11. Retire now Chuck while you have some dignity left. "

Stan wrote on July 24, 2008 2:12 pm:
" I find it somewhat interesting how a certain lame duck can suddenly voice his opinion when how many years he had to do something about the issues. Same mouth music coming from Washington. When will the people be heard. Dont get me wrong, this still is a great country but we need to get back on track. Everything is having effects with the world. Why do we think we can fix everything by money monet money. "

N. Chaimberlin wrote on July 24, 2008 2:16 pm:
" If "bipartisan foreign policy" is code for "blindly follow Europe's lead", my guess is that he's hanging out with the right person.

His job hunting is so transparent that it's almost laughable. "

Hey Chuck wrote on July 24, 2008 2:18 pm:
" Come to Colorado where we will elect you for any job you want. They want to blackball you in nebraska anyway. The United States need a hell of a lot more Chuck Hagels and a hell of a lot less george bushes; "

JD wrote on July 24, 2008 2:24 pm:
" The "Vietnam Syndrome" strikes again. The Cold War communist threat and the 21st century terrorist threat are miles apart.
The long list of reasons for the Iraq invasion were supported by Congress. Afghanistan is an afterthought...time to move forward. "

To Hey Chuck wrote on July 24, 2008 3:13 pm:
" Hey Chuck, I'm a Nebraskan who does appreciate Chuck Hagel. The uninformed above (Stan) who said he didn't do anything while he was in office doesn't know what he is talking about. Chuck was one of the few Republicans, and the only outspoken one, to criticize the war - despite knowing that it would make him unpopular to his own party. I wish Chuck well and certainly wouldn't blame him for going to Colorado - but I really hope he stays here - if for no other reason than to keep the "bush-babies" mad. His time spent with Obama shows you that it is possible to be bipartisan. "

Don wrote on July 24, 2008 3:23 pm:
" Chuck Hagel, who is a Republican in name only and a practicing Democrat says we need bipartisanship in foreign policy. What he means is that the foreign policy should be in line with what the Democrats want. If there is no bipartisanship now, it is because of people like Chuck who stands against everything that the present administration stands for. Bipartisanship to him also means that a Democrat (Obama) nominates someone who is known as a Republican (Chuck) to be vicepresident. If they want this guy in Colorado, let him go. Maybe he can promote bipartisanship there and convince some CU fans to also support NU. "

MoreDoc wrote on July 24, 2008 3:36 pm:
" Define victory in Vietnam. Define victory in Iraq. The enemy is endless from inside and outside its borders. The US is in no position to take over and run a country, no matter what rate, when the region doesn't want it. The British couldn't do it here either while we were less than 3rd rate. Get it, finally? Its not about terrorists, its about homeland. We need to take care of business at home which sure could use some attention. And the trillions spent over there would sure help here. And no, the terrorists are not going to get me as neither did the commies. "

JR wrote on July 24, 2008 4:00 pm:
" Isn't it amazing how Chuck Hagel can win his last election by the numbers he did, and by merely voicing his opinion about the war in Iraq, go from being one of the most conservative senators to being a "practicing democrat"? And also, how interesting that if we finally decide after 8 years, we want an intelligent approach to foreign policy instead of the failed cowboy way, we are now accused of wanting to "blindly follow Europe's lead". Plus, let's not forget if one does not think our presence in Iraq is the right move will, "when push comes to shove, he'll side with the muslims".

I have to ask, do you people really believe some of the stuff you write, or does it just flow from your fingers. "

Pay Attention Don wrote on July 24, 2008 4:21 pm:
" The fact is, Don, that Chuck Hagel voted with Bush more than any other Senator in Washington. You are saying just the opposite. Please let's keep it at least halfway real. Where in the world are you getting your "facts"? "

Whats up DOC wrote on July 24, 2008 5:09 pm:
" As the LJS reported recently, it's hard to know what to believe on the Internet. PolitiFact.com, a joint project of the St. Petersburg Times and
Congressional Quarterly, researches chain e-mail claims — as well as claims by candidates — and rates them on its truth-o-meter.
The reason I bring it up is that they debunk your "Obama who has said in his book, when push comes to shove, he'll side with the muslims" as the outright pants-on-fire lie that it is. "

I just wrote on July 24, 2008 5:51 pm:
" Love it how these armchair generals who never put on the uniform know how to fight wars. Congress does did not tell the military how to fight in Vietnam, the president tells the military what to do. It was Nixon's policies that lost the war. Congress controls the purse strings but they provided ample funding to the military during Vietnam. How do I know? I fought in Vietnam and speak from experience.

I urge all who think Hagel is wrong about war, go enlist and show us all how to fight wars. "

Hey Don wrote on July 24, 2008 7:52 pm:
" Why does it surprise me that a person can converse about politics and damned if someone from the bugeater state doesn't bring football into the flow. I just , I agree with you. If someone hasn't heard bombs bursting in air, and ak47 hornets around your head, they should get a uniform, put in on, and hitch a ride to iraq. Not afghanistan, to iraq where they can help the bush family and cheney family lock up some oil. Hey, I just remember lady bird johnson and her connections to bell helicoptors "

Tom wrote on July 24, 2008 8:17 pm:
" I for one cannot wait until Chuck is gone and forgotten about. He is a turncoat and the only thing he truly cares about is himself! "

AlsoGary wrote on July 24, 2008 10:28 pm:
" Hagel is nothing but a big business Bush supporter who took fancy to being a mavrick only after he saw he couldn't be re-elected. Probably the biggest phoney politician on the American scene in a decade. He will soon be forgotten. I pay more attention to Al Sharpton. He's consistant if nothing else. Check just wants to be in the National news. "

JB wrote on July 24, 2008 11:26 pm:
" I remember when GW Bush lost the popular vote for president to Al Gore eight years ago that he mentioned the word "bipartisan". That was some of Bush's double talk. Hagel is the only Republican in the state with half a brain, which is a half more then most. "

Ken Brestel wrote on July 25, 2008 5:59 am:
" Hey you Hagel lovers, I hope he goes to Colorado. He will fit right in with the Bush haters and other ingrate anti-american crowd.

Bipartisan? When was the last time Hagel went to Iraq or Iran with McCain. Who has been there many times as a Senator. Obama wouldn't have gone yet if McCain hadn't shamed him into going. "

Whoa DOC wrote on July 25, 2008 12:16 pm:
" The only way the Vietnam war could have been "won" would have been a total war to destroy that small country and kill every Vietnamese that supported a unified, independent Vietnam. The best solution would have been to have supported Vietnam's independence in the early 1940's when Ho Chi Minh requested the US to do so. Of course, slighting the French by suggesting such a thing was too much so we let the Soviets and Chinese take those honors. Congress allowed for the escalation of the Vietnam war in the 60's by giving President Johnson the power to do so based on flimsy evidence that US warships had been attacked in the Tonkin Gulf. Whether these attacks actually happened is still disputed as no one ever saw the Vietnamese attack boats. The reason Chuck Hagel might be looking so "blue" in the picture is that he also realizes the parallels between our failed and foolish war in Vietnam and our current invasion of Iraq. It sure makes me feel blue when I think about it. "

democrat wrote on July 25, 2008 1:13 pm:
" Amazing how folks can call Senator Hagel a "practicing democrat" when he has the most conservative voting record of ALL 100 senators. He has voted with Bush more than ANYONE in the senate. How many ways can I say this before people get it? "

To N. Chamberlain wrote on July 25, 2008 2:14 pm:
" After 8 years of Bush's do-it-alone attitude, I would certainly hope we would again form a partnership with Europe and with the rest of the world. Bipartisan policy doesn't mean blindly following every lead. When has that happened in the history of American foreign policy? Before you come on here spewing idiotic statements, maybe you should check your facts first. And if you think in such a one-dimensional way, please DON'T VOTE. "