Heineman sends letter opposing casino proposal in Iowa
By The Associated Press
Nebraska’s governor is voicing concerns about a proposed casino in Iowa on land near the Nebraska-Iowa border.
Gov. Dave Heineman has sent a letter to the secretary of the interior opposing the plan. Under federal legislation, the secretary appoints two of the three members of the National Indian Gaming Commission.
Nebraska doesn’t allow casino gambling, but Iowa does. The rub is that an American Indian tribe has received permission from the National Indian Gaming Commission to run a casino at Carter Lake, Iowa.
Carter Lake is on the Nebraska side of the Missouri River, just northeast of downtown Omaha. Its land was originally on the river’s east side, but flooding and shifting in 1877 left 2,000 acres on west side of the river, according to the city’s Web site.
Heineman said in his letter that the city of Omaha would be charged with providing the necessary infrastructure for the project. He also said a casino will worsen the social ills associated with problem gambling.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
kk wrote on May 21, 2008 9:11 am:
John Holmes wrote on May 21, 2008 9:17 am:
john q wrote on May 21, 2008 9:17 am:
Because wrote on May 21, 2008 9:24 am:
Get over it wrote on May 21, 2008 9:27 am:
Jack S wrote on May 21, 2008 9:33 am:
It is obvious these casinos are filling a strong demand in Nebraska "
Comm UnSense wrote on May 21, 2008 9:35 am:
Greg wrote on May 21, 2008 9:37 am:
Tim wrote on May 21, 2008 9:42 am:
Kevin wrote on May 21, 2008 9:50 am:
mitchy_v wrote on May 21, 2008 9:53 am:
Matt wrote on May 21, 2008 10:10 am:
You better NOT wrote on May 21, 2008 10:26 am:
Man he really taking charge amd telling another State what they should be doing!. I guess it is easier too take on issues that he can not change only to have something to do or make it seem it he is doing something.
I wonder what finger he used to see what way the wind was blowing when he decided to take on the this worthless cause! "
Jon wrote on May 21, 2008 10:29 am:
Concerned wrote on May 21, 2008 10:29 am:
Eric wrote on May 21, 2008 10:39 am:
oh come on wrote on May 21, 2008 10:41 am:
ellfie wrote on May 21, 2008 10:44 am:
Figure it Out wrote on May 21, 2008 10:44 am:
Re Matt wrote on May 21, 2008 10:46 am:
anne wrote on May 21, 2008 10:48 am:
O.K wrote on May 21, 2008 11:02 am:
with it. But the leaders sure don't mind taxing their citizens to the
brink and only allowing college degreed jobs. A life long Nebraskan had
to move to an assisted living home in Iowa because the person couldn't
afford to spend the rest of her life in her home state. How sad, but this
is the norm! Its not only the youth leaving! But I doubt Nebraska will
ever wake up, because 50 years ago my parents use to say Nebraskans were
the most bullheaded people there are. Take a look at this state, except
for Omaha it has regressed and continues. My goodness, when someone
wanted to build an auto race track and the leaders put the brakes on it
then shove the state fair out, - you tell me what next, there isn't anything left to shove!! As someone said the other day to me, "this is
the most worthless state in the U.S." For crap sakes PROGRESS but quit
digging the taxpayers, they are BROKE!! Ya can't grow and build over night, but for the last 50 years, where on earth has this state been????
Talk about LAZY, yep Nebraska is Number 1 in that too!!!!!!!!! A good
indication is, in one of the town's, with 3 ro 4 running for mayor, on
running stated, "they would put an Albertson's grocery in their town."
Well again, that proposed mayor elect apparently didn't know there isn't
an Albertson grocery anymore!!!! Yeah, Nebraska is really on the ball!!! "
Nina wrote on May 21, 2008 11:13 am:
IOWA wrote on May 21, 2008 12:00 pm:
Casino wrote on May 21, 2008 12:01 pm:
I reside in Las Vegas and we have many casios. The problems with gaming isn't going to effect the majority of population, but will effect those that will allow gaming to control their lives.
Gaming adds employment and money into the staete, which last time looked Nebraska was really burning up the list for states that acutally made money. Although gaming does add negative aspects on the darker side of life, it also adds income and employment which I'm sure the State of Nebraska needs. Correct me if I'm wrong.... "
Wake up NE wrote on May 21, 2008 12:08 pm:
jp wrote on May 21, 2008 12:13 pm:
pay for the costs. "
Gambling vs. drinking wrote on May 21, 2008 12:29 pm:
Oh wrote on May 21, 2008 12:31 pm:
drinking!! Seems kind of silly, to outlaw gambling, yet have the lottary
and drinking. All those people your filling the jails up with, are they
just the ones caught speeding and maybe knitting in public???? Ya let down your morals and gamble once, your probably gonna gamble again. But
I just bet if you buy a lottary ticket or take a drink, your not going to
stop at one time. If so why does Lincoln have a downtown full of bars,
bars, bars. Thats like some parents teaching their kids to drink liquor
"socially." I've seen alot of those kind end up in "lovely" jails or
morgues or laying on the street panhandling!!! "
Be Consistent wrote on May 21, 2008 12:54 pm:
toasted wrote on May 21, 2008 1:02 pm:
What do you consider Council Bluffs? Heineman is not very bright.
"
Daffy Duck wrote on May 21, 2008 1:08 pm:
James wrote on May 21, 2008 1:27 pm:
It is so sad when wrote on May 21, 2008 1:40 pm:
Lauren wrote on May 21, 2008 1:49 pm:
Not Just in Iowa wrote on May 21, 2008 1:50 pm:
what everyone is asking wrote on May 21, 2008 2:00 pm:
Congrats wrote on May 21, 2008 2:04 pm:
Nebraska could have had casino gambling and be making some money to provide tax relief, but instead we have a few standing on their 'no gambling' principles so their fellow Nebraskans have to cross the border into Iowa, Kansas, South Dakota or Missouri to gamble.
No thank you, Nebraska doesn't want any of that dirty gambling money!
Except of course for keno, the lottery, and pull tabs.
I forget. What do the terms 'hypocritical' and 'short-sighted' mean?
"
KYKP wrote on May 21, 2008 2:09 pm:
KYKP wrote on May 21, 2008 2:12 pm:
taxem wrote on May 21, 2008 2:22 pm:
Huh wrote on May 21, 2008 2:29 pm:
unknown wrote on May 21, 2008 2:35 pm:
hate ne politicans wrote on May 21, 2008 2:45 pm:
Dirrty wrote on May 21, 2008 2:54 pm:
More Info Please wrote on May 21, 2008 3:08 pm:
However, I suspect that if the article was written better we would see his objection to Omaha being stuck with the costs and impact of infrastructure actually has some merit.
But if Iowa is going to (rightfully) pick up the tab, then this is a non-issue and falls under standard issue posturing by the Johanns/Heineman/Bruning regime. "
natefrog wrote on May 21, 2008 3:43 pm:
LDE wrote on May 21, 2008 4:51 pm:
GoHeineman wrote on May 21, 2008 5:08 pm:
David wrote on May 21, 2008 6:23 pm:
whatever wrote on May 21, 2008 7:53 pm:
AWP wrote on May 21, 2008 8:05 pm:
Tired of Whining wrote on May 21, 2008 8:11 pm:
The Omega Man wrote on May 21, 2008 9:01 pm:
dewboy wrote on May 21, 2008 9:28 pm:
Mind our own business wrote on May 22, 2008 7:41 am:
MID wrote on May 22, 2008 7:47 am:
Ryan wrote on May 22, 2008 8:26 am:
natefrog wrote on May 22, 2008 10:41 am:
Economist wrote on May 22, 2008 2:27 pm:
MarkyMark wrote on May 22, 2008 3:18 pm:
gimme a break wrote on May 22, 2008 4:13 pm:
scared wrote on May 22, 2008 4:23 pm:
fun wrote on May 22, 2008 4:57 pm:
whining wrote on May 22, 2008 4:59 pm: