Bruning takes housing discrimination fight to CNN
By TIMBERLY ROSS / Associated Press Writer
OMAHA — Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning on Monday defended his refusal to prosecute housing discrimination cases on CNN’s “Lou Dobbs Tonight,” again couching his stance in the nationwide debate over illegal immigration.
“In Nebraska, like every other state, our taxpayers have had enough, and they don’t want to see their state attorney represent illegal immigrants,” Bruning said on the show, which Dobbs has often used as a platform to protest illegal immigration.
“My office isn’t going to be the free lawyer for illegal immigrants,” Bruning said.
The attorney general has been in the spotlight recently for refusing to prosecute cases of alleged housing discrimination brought to him by the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission. But NEOC officials have stressed that while Bruning has made public comments about his refusal to file housing discrimination actions on behalf of illegal immigrants, only one case has involved people in the country illegally. Other discrimination cases have involved U.S. citizens, including disabled people and single parents.
Bruning detractors say he is simply using the illegal immigration issue for political gain.
“Jon Bruning is making a mockery of our state,” said Lincoln attorney Kathleen Neary after watching Bruning’s television appearance. “He is somehow taking pride in the fact that he is not enforcing our laws. It is an embarrassment.”
Neary’s firm, Vince Powers and Associates, and at least three other law firms, the names of which have not been made public, have offered to help the NEOC in its fight with Bruning.
“This case has nothing to do with one illegal resident,” Neary said. “This case has everything to do with the dozens of cases Jon Bruning has refused to file on behalf of disabled Nebraskans, Nebraskans with families, for the last six years.”
NEOC Chairman Arnold Nesbitt said Monday night that Bruning is trying to turn the commission’s concerns about prosecution of its discrimination cases into something it’s not.
“It is not an illegal immigration issue — it never has been, it never will be,” he said.
Since 2003, the commission has said, it has forwarded 41 cases to Bruning’s office, but only one was prosecuted and none has gone to trial. But, according to Bruning’s office, it’s pursued 22 of 58 cases received from the commission.
Bruning has said shoddy casework by commission staff limits the number of cases he can pursue. However, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, which gives Nebraska money to help prosecute housing discrimination cases, has not deemed the commission’s investigations substandard.
The NEOC stands to lose $240,000 in federal funding if it fails to get cases prosecuted.
Neary and Powers have said state law requires the attorney general to prosecute the commission’s cases, but Bruning contends it gives him the option of whether to prosecute.
The disagreement between Bruning and the commission boiled over last month when Bruning said that while the law protects illegal immigrants from discrimination, he isn’t legally obligated to prosecute on their behalf and that they should seek legal counsel elsewhere.
“It’s important, I think, to be judicious with our precious tax dollars, and don’t spend them willy nilly on someone who isn’t a citizen,” Bruning said Monday on CNN.
He has cited federal welfare law in his refusal to take commission cases involving illegal immigrants.
But HUD officials have said that in housing law, a person’s immigration status is irrelevant.
Officials from Bruning’s office and a member of the commission have been trying to reach an agreement on how to prosecute more discrimination cases to satisfy both federal officials and the commission, according to both sides.
But the progress of those talks looks bleak. NEOC executive director Anne Hobbes said earlier Monday that Bruning has been putting his political agenda before state law.
“Every time we make some headway, he seems to take action like this (appearing on CNN), which is for his own political gain, and that sets back our progress tenfold,” she said.
Hobbs said the commission will discuss how to proceed, including whether to accept offers of free counsel from several Nebraska law firms, at its Friday meeting.
The commission already has enlisted the help of a California law firm, over Bruning’s objection, to negotiate with federal officials and Bruning about the commission’s handling of housing discrimination cases.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
What a guy wrote on May 13, 2008 3:41 am:
Mike wrote on May 13, 2008 3:43 am:
Mindless Robot wrote on May 13, 2008 4:16 am:
DOC wrote on May 13, 2008 4:18 am:
megan wrote on May 13, 2008 4:48 am:
Tom wrote on May 13, 2008 5:09 am:
Eric wrote on May 13, 2008 5:18 am:
Hjalmer wrote on May 13, 2008 5:57 am:
Hows that again... wrote on May 13, 2008 6:04 am:
The only way Mr. Bruning can be setting back your progress Ms. Neary,
is if there are enough people that agree with his thinking. I aplaud
Mr. Bruning for at least bringing the issue out out front if nothing else.
"
What if wrote on May 13, 2008 6:31 am:
“In Nebraska, like every other state, our taxpayers have had enough, and they don’t want to see their state attorney represent illegal immigrants,”
Does this mean that the AG's office would not prosecute someone who murders an illegal immigrant in the state?
I understand not wanting to "defend" illegal immigrants, but I would guess that if a landlord were to discriminate against illegal aliens, they would also be likely to discriminate against other minoritys who have a legal status. This is what he would be fighting, even though yes, this would have to happen by representing illegal immigrants.
The law is the law. A man who steals a penny is no better or no worse than a man who steals a thousand dollars. They are both criminals reagrdless of the amount. The law must be upheld, as he swore to do. What an embarassment Jon Bruning is to Nebraska. "
In the past several days... wrote on May 13, 2008 6:34 am:
Let's hear Bruning respond to the allegations that only one of the cases involves illegal immigrants while the majority he refuses to prosecute involve American citizens. Why has he been fighting this agency for years? Why haven't we heard this hue and cry from Bruning for the past several years regarding these cases dealing with Americans? I also want to hear specific details about what steps Bruning's office has taken to improve the "shoddy" casework from the agency they're fighting. If the NEOC is doing such a poor job of investigating, what has Bruning's office been doing to improve their investigations, since he is the NEOC's "real" legal counsel?
I'd like to hear answers to all of these questions. Somehow, Mr. Dodd forgot to ask these questions last night. "
outwesterner wrote on May 13, 2008 6:51 am:
Ts Buddy wrote on May 13, 2008 6:52 am:
Jennifer wrote on May 13, 2008 7:07 am:
If I have understood correctly, there was only one case that involved illegal immigrants. What about the disabled, single moms, or families with lots of loud children that were discriminated against? He keeps claiming that Nebraskans want this or don't want that; I'm a Nebraskan and I'd like to tell Mr. Bruning that I would like him to do his job! Ok, don't prosecute the case involving illegal immigrants, but please prosecute the others!!! "
Dave wrote on May 13, 2008 7:36 am:
Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii)
"Any person who . . . encourages or induces an alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."
Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):
A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:
* assists an alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or
* encourages that alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or
* knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.
Enough said! "
mishmash wrote on May 13, 2008 7:41 am:
In his words wrote on May 13, 2008 8:03 am:
Thank you for your recent letter of support regarding the interactions between my office and the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission (NEOC). I take the responsibility of protecting Nebraska taxpayer dollars very seriously.
Since I became Attorney General in 2003, my office has filed 13 of 21 housing cases referred to us where the NEOC found reasonable cause that discrimination occurred. The contention by the NEOC that we have not pursued a single case is wrong.
In regard to the recent case that has garnered so much attention, our office initially did not pursue the case because there was no evidence of discrimination, not because of the tenant’s immigration status. The tenant, who was late on his rent, was asked for a copy of his driver’s license, as was every other tenant in the complex. He was not treated any differently than anyone else. In fact, he volunteered his status and asked our office not to proceed with the case.
The immigration issue came to light when I was asked whether my office would represent an illegal alien against a landlord in a civil case. My position is this: While I will always prosecute a landlord who has a pattern and practice of actual discrimination, I will not file lawsuits to seek monetary damages on behalf of illegal aliens.
Jon Bruning
Attorney General
"
Recall Bruning wrote on May 13, 2008 8:03 am:
Action wrote on May 13, 2008 8:03 am:
ED wrote on May 13, 2008 8:04 am:
Grundle wrote on May 13, 2008 8:31 am:
Despite wrote on May 13, 2008 8:33 am:
BTW, how does Bruning know that that person was an illegal immigrant in the first place?
Also, where in the US Constitution does it say that the laws of this country only apply to citizens? I thought the constitution applied to ALL People in the country and not just a select few.
Bruning is just grandstanding as usual. He needs to see his name in the paper whether he is right or wrong. "
Dano wrote on May 13, 2008 8:45 am:
You want to run for office fine, but do it on your own time/dime, not the taxpayers. I want an AG that is here, spending his time on cases and issues. Not visiting Iraq, grandstanding on TV, etc. Thjis guy will never get my vote for a office in this state, again. "
jo wrote on May 13, 2008 8:47 am:
So Simple wrote on May 13, 2008 8:48 am:
Maybe if Bruning spent more time in the state working, and less time trying to get his name in the paper he could make a difference (and build a case for the next office he seeks). "
JR wrote on May 13, 2008 8:51 am:
peb wrote on May 13, 2008 9:04 am:
Howie wrote on May 13, 2008 9:11 am:
Out with Bruning wrote on May 13, 2008 9:15 am:
josh wrote on May 13, 2008 9:32 am:
Craig wrote on May 13, 2008 9:37 am:
natefrog wrote on May 13, 2008 9:57 am:
Negative Ned wrote on May 13, 2008 10:15 am:
K. wrote on May 13, 2008 11:49 am:
Hey Ned wrote on May 13, 2008 12:25 pm:
wrote on May 13, 2008 12:28 pm:
soonbxRpblcn wrote on May 13, 2008 12:40 pm:
Bruning Supporter wrote on May 13, 2008 12:47 pm:
The real issue here is the incompetency of the NEOC and their consistency in bringing frivolous, undefensible cases to the AG's office. That's it in a nutshell. The AG's office cannot bring cases to court with taxpayer dollars IF THEY DON'T THINK THE STATE CAN WIN. Which part of that is difficult to understand? This is why there has been so much discussion on the training of the NEOC lawyers and how they put together cases. Bruning made this into "illegal immigrant" case for publicity purposes, but the real behind the scenes story is the poor job the NEOC has done in putting together cases. "
Thank you wrote on May 13, 2008 1:33 pm:
DLJ wrote on May 13, 2008 3:09 pm:
homey wrote on May 13, 2008 3:55 pm:
“It is not an illegal immigration issue — it never has been, it never will be,”
These words seem to be lost on many. Bruning's strategy of blinding the citizens is working. Hide evrything behind one case, scream illegal immigrant and Bubba and all of buddies are there for ya regardless of the taxpaying citizens and legal citizens that are also being hurt here.
And people wonder why I laugh when they show comercials about Nebraska values and how we all look out after each other !! "
HTA wrote on May 13, 2008 5:54 pm:
booing wrote on May 13, 2008 6:15 pm:
To the blogger who requested the Governor fire Bruning: Bruning is elected, therefore the Governor cannot control Bruning one bit.
Frankly, if he is choosing to not prosecute cases, maybe one could file a complaint against the bar association? Especially if he is flagrantly ignoring the Federal law?
Might be worth checking out.
"
airedale wrote on May 13, 2008 6:23 pm:
In other words I think Dobbs knows a tinhorn when he sees one.
Jon has done NOTHING and will continue to do NOTHING about illegal immigration. This is just more smoke and mirrors to cover up the bad job he has done representing the State of Nebraska.
"
Not taxpayers wrote on May 13, 2008 7:22 pm:
yeah wrote on May 13, 2008 9:44 pm:
Mayday wrote on May 13, 2008 11:14 pm:
Matt Poulsen wrote on May 14, 2008 1:37 am:
Calm down people wrote on May 14, 2008 6:10 am:
ON TV wrote on May 14, 2008 9:02 am:
Bruning is a Joke wrote on May 14, 2008 11:38 am:
geewhiz wrote on May 14, 2008 7:23 pm: