Now
Overcast
52°
High
65°
Low
46°

No midwives allowed

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By NANCY HICKS / Lincoln Journal Star

Sunday, Jul 09, 2006 - 12:58:44 pm CDT

Carson Miles  Loll, 7 pounds 15 ounces ,  came into this world in the early morning hours of June 23 . . . in the basement of his parents’ house . . . in a soft plastic kiddie swimming pool, adorned with brightly colored fishes .

His dad, Michael, who caught him and clamped his umbilical cord, was the only person attending his birth — besides Carson’s mom, Karen,  who really wanted to give birth at home,  with a certified nurse midwife helping out.

But Nebraska state law does not allow certified nurse midwives to attend home deliveries.

Story Photo
Karen Loll gave birth to her third son, Carson, two weeks ago in the family's inflatable swimming pool.(Teresa Prince)

And the state has threatened unlicensed midwives with prosecution if they  attend home deliveries, according to Heather Swanson, a nurse midwife from Wilcox.

So Karen, pregnant with her third child, was faced with two choices:   

* Deliver at the hospital with her nurse midwife, or  

* Deliver at home, with no help but her husband.

She chose home, alone. 

Two weeks later, everyone is doing well.  Little Carson lounges in a pouch sling around his mom’s neck, while brothers Hayden and Blaine  peek in to kiss him.

Karen would like to see the state law changed.

A group of consumers and nurse midwives has been working without success for more than a decade to get the law changed so  licensed nurse midwives could help with home deliveries.  The consumers would also like to see other midwives without a nursing background licensed by the state. 

 At least three times in the past decade  state senators have refused to budge on the home birth issue.

This year, supporters of home birthing took their case to a state agency review process that can recommend changes to the Legislature, pointing out the  lengths some Nebraska women will go to to have a home birth.

   Expectant women in western Nebraska have reported traveling to Wyoming to have midwife-attended births in hotel rooms. 

Others have arranged to have out-of-state midwives to attend their home birth, according to Swanson, a certified nurse midwife who has been working on the home birth issue.

Others, like Karen Loll, have relied on family members.

Karen said she doesn’t understand the reluctance to give women the choice.  Births at home are the natural order, she says.

In fact, home births are becoming more mainstream as celebrities like actress Ricki Lake and Demi Moore talk about their experiences and television shows like “House of Babies” explore midwifery and home births.

For Karen, a home birth was the best way.  

She knew she would be more relaxed at home — before and after delivery.

Karen isn’t comfortable at the hospital. 

The beds were so uncomfortable at the old birthing unit of Saint Elizabeth Regional Medical Center that she made her husband sleep on the bed and she slept on the lounge chair.

She couldn’t get a decent night’s sleep, what with the nurses coming in to check things out.

“I didn’t want to do the hospital this time. I need to focus and relax and I couldn’t do that in a hospital setting.”

She had previously had long, but easy labors.

This time her labor was fast — just four hours.  

She delivered early in the morning, when her “half-asleep husband was too tired to freak out.”

Michael was not happy with the whole idea, she said. He wholeheartedly supported a home birth — with a midwife, she said.

He was less sure about doing double duty as midwife and husband.

But Karen wasn’t worried about a potential problem. “I can see the hospital from my house,” she said.

‘“If there had been any kind of a problem I would have gone to the hospital,” she said.

Karen and Michael set up a birthing pool in their basement — an inflatable pool with soft sides and an inflated bottom that she bought at Toys R Us. 

“It was big enough for me to actually float in” and deeper than the birthing tubs at the hospital, she said.

The couple’s two other little boys were asleep in their upstairs bedrooms. 

Karen said she did months of online research before she became a “UCer” — unassisted childbirther. That’s how she discovered the best pool. That’s where she bought the umbilical cord clamp.

It was her best delivery yet.  “I gave birth at 4 a.m. and I was up at 8 a.m. making breakfast for the family.”

Six hours after giving birth, mom, dad and baby went to see the nurse midwife for a checkup.  Karen got two stitches and found out how much her third child weighed at birth.

She had the state required PKU tests at the hospital later in the week. 

A week later they went to the pediatrician for a checkup. 

A few states allow  midwives to attend births.

But many states require a physician’s agreement with the licensed nurse midwife, which is a practical limitation on the number of licensed midwives who can offer help at home births. 

Nebraska is one of just two states to prohibit certified nurse midwives from attending home births, according to Swanson.

“When it comes to births in Nebraska, women have little or no choice,” said Karen.

Reach Nancy Hicks at 473-7250 or nhicks@journalstar.com.

The arguments over home birthing

* For home births: 

Giving birth is a natural process , not a disease, and should be treated that way, said Dr. Daryl Wills, a Gering chiropractor, who participated in the review process.

Supporters point to studies showing that births attended by licensed midwives have better outcomes than physician-attended births.

The worst outcomes are at home births with no one or with unlicensed people helping.  And that is the situation in Nebraska today, points out Heather Swanson, a nurse midwife from Wilcox, who has led the recent effort to change Nebraska’s law. 

In 2003, the state recorded 68 home births, she said.

* Against home births:

Safety is the big issue for opponents.

They  point to studies that indicate giving birth at home is more dangerous than in a hospital.

Home births are inherently risky, and even with low-risk pregnancies things can quickly go wrong, according to opponents at a recent public hearing on the issue.

For the safety of both mother and baby, a hospital is the safest place to give birth, opponents say.

Encouraging home births is a step backward to the 1800s, said Dr. Les Spry, a Lincoln physician.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Alice wrote on July 9, 2006 6:56 am:
" It isn't about safety at all. It's about money. Big Medicine labels as "dangerous", "risky" or "backward" any means of prevention or healing that threatens its revenue stream. "

c.h. wrote on July 9, 2006 8:29 am:
" ...Yet another example of Nebraska's penchant for removing as many choices as possible from it's citizens. "

Melissa wrote on July 9, 2006 9:04 am:
" Well said Alice. It isn't about the woman anymore. Just doctor's making money and turning pregnancy into a disease. "

JWB wrote on July 9, 2006 9:20 am:
" I guess there is no "pro Choice" in home delivery. It is a womans baby, it should be her choice how and where that baby is born. "

Sara wrote on July 9, 2006 9:39 am:
" It is most definetely about safety! Things can go wrong quickly in a birth, requiring a C-section to save the baby (as was the case in my daughter's birth). As a state we have to do whatever we can to protect our citizens, even the smallest ones. "

DD wrote on July 9, 2006 9:42 am:
" Just another way the state is staying in the pockets of the doctors. Should be the choice of the woman who is giving birth, it doesn't matter if it is taking a step backwards, it's the comfort of those in labor. And I have yet to see a man go through labor. "

NV wrote on July 9, 2006 9:43 am:
" I think it is so backwards of Nebraska to not allow midwifery. This is how it has been done for years in the UK. You get one on one attention and don't have to sit in an office for 30 minutes each visit while your charges are racked up! You can bond with a person you know will get you through a life changing time AND they then follow up with home visits. So nice for those women who don't even feel getting out after having a baby, or might not even be able to. Lets change this law for Nebraska! "

Meghan wrote on July 9, 2006 9:43 am:
" If safety is the main concern it seems that allowing an attended home birth would be the better option. Many women decide to take the more dangerous route of an un attended birth because they have no other option. "

jon wrote on July 9, 2006 10:04 am:
" Is the state going to start regulating when and how I evacuate my bowels next? This is another example of Government entering and controlling our lives.Stop this immediatly! Dr.Spry,encouraging government accessablility into any facet of our lives is taking a step back to 1400's in Europe. I understand that this may put a dent in your income and home health is greatly discouraged by the medical profession.Just like changing oil at home is greatly discouraged by JiffyLube. "

Caroline wrote on July 9, 2006 10:38 am:
" Wake up people! Thank God there are people still willing to take a chance and give birth in a hospital. The baby is the main concern, not how peacful the mother is. If anything goes wrong I for one want plenty of medical professionals around to help. Mothers are taking a risk for them selves as well as the unborn child. Once there isd a fetus it is no longer just the womans body. There are two lives to protect and where better then in a hospital with trained professionals. "

Sarah Keeter wrote on July 9, 2006 10:51 am:
" Way to go Karen! "

Ruth wrote on July 9, 2006 10:56 am:
" That's my daughter, and I'm mighty proud of her. My message to state senators: Give women the right to choose! "

medosmommy wrote on July 9, 2006 11:20 am:
" thats absurd that if you want to have your child at home you cannot have someone that is certified to be there to assist if you need help...yet another way making sure america is making money off of good people...i bet if the hospital bills werent so expensive they really wouldnt care! "

NH wrote on July 9, 2006 11:43 am:
" We are lucky to be a society with modern medicine readily available to us; unnecessary death and injury can be easily avoided. Grow a brain folks. "

Phil wrote on July 9, 2006 11:50 am:
" How arrogant. Women have given birth without the benefit of hospitals, obstetricians, insurance companies, for thousands of years. And now, the enlightened ones have it all figured it out, that God was wrong. Of course, our modern medical industry has figured out how to correct God's foul ups. Give me a break. The day that the Nebraska Medical Community stands up with a unified voice and declares abortion to be a barbaric and indefensible practice, is the day I'll begin to regain some respect for them. Until then, this is absolutely about the money. Women don't need help from the medical industry in getting pregnent, and they don't "need" help on the other end, if they so desire. "

to Caroline wrote on July 9, 2006 12:06 pm:
" While there may be another life involved, that of the child. It is medically proven that a mother's ability to manage and control her comfort level decreases the number of complications for the baby. Also, it shortens the labor process and allows for fewer medical interventions during labor. Childbirth is not a medical procedure, it is a natural process that women have been experiencing for hundreds of years. Lighten up and realize that the welfare of the mother improves the welfare of the baby. I am all for legalizing nurse midwives attending home births. These nurses are trained and competent, and with a physician's approval, why not let the mother to be enjoy the relaxation of her own home. Quite honestly with the number of infections that are obtained during hospital stays, it's probably better for all involved. "

In Geneva wrote on July 9, 2006 12:37 pm:
" Having an attended home-birth in Nebraska should be the right of the parents. The curious thing is that here there is still a doctor who makes house calls. Suppose its legal to have an MD attend a home birth? If a certified nurse midwife can not attend a home birth, then EMTs should legally be required to tell a delivering woman to hold the baby in and not push until the ambulance reaches the hospital! "

BBCatcher wrote on July 9, 2006 1:39 pm:
" "But many states require a physician’s agreement with the licensed nurse midwife, which is a practical limitation on the number of licensed midwives who can offer help at home births." There lies the problem. If Nebraska required Nurse Midwives to get an agreement from someone who they are competing with (doctors) you will never see nurse midwives practice. This is a dollars and cents issue. Those doctors don't want to loose money to midwives. It is all about the money. Besides, how many doctors even have a clue about what a homebirth is about... are they really educated enough about the home birth process to even be in a supervisory position? Ask any OB if he has even done a home birth...I dare ya! He wouldn't know what to do without an operating room and a dozen nurse who do all of the work. (the three ring circus and he/she is the master of ceremony). The fact that Certified Nurse Midwives are not allowed to practice their trade (home birth) is a violation of federal antitrust laws.... Wake Up Nebraska!!! "

SS wrote on July 9, 2006 1:58 pm:
" I have been following the efforts of a group in Nebraska that is trying to pass legislation allowing women to choose a home birth. Please...if you want the right to choose where and how you give birth (or the right for the women in your life that you care about), go to the website www.nemidwives.org. They have been working tirelessly to pass legislation allowing homebirths. So far, it does not appear to be going well so they need much more support and involvement from the citizens of Nebraska! Unfortunately, birthing has become a very profitable business and it is not so much about the safety of the woman or baby anymore, but about protecting the ob/gyn profits and the hospital profits. I can bet that if a man had to give birth, they would be able to pick when, how, and where they gave birth! Unfortunately, men still dominate the medical field and feel women should should also be "controlled" as to where and when they give birth. Research has shown over and over that home birth is as safe, or safer, than a hospital birth. Many other countries, such as the Netherlands, have many home births and have a lower infant mortality statistic than the U.S.! Also, Nebraska seems to be one of only a few states in the U.S. that does not allow home birth. I spent many years living in KS and it was legal there and I heard of some women having wonderful experiences birthing at home with a licensed midwife. The only way women will have the right to choose where to give birth, is for any one that agrees to access the above website and start getting involved to change it!! "

ex-lincolnite wrote on July 9, 2006 2:42 pm:
" I bithed two of my children at home- midwife assisted births in the "backwards" countries of Switzerland and France. All European countires allow women to choose assisted home births. Why can't Nebraska? Hospitals are for sick people, not healthy babies and mothers. "

DG wrote on July 9, 2006 3:50 pm:
" Great article. I gave birth at home in Nebraska one year ago. It turned out much better than my two hospital births. We have recently moved out of state and one of our considerations in choosing where to move was the availability of legal midwives. We settled on New Mexico in a county where 33% of births occur outside of the hospital. Women and babies in Nebraska deserve to have the competent, compassionate care of a midwife if they so choose. I hope that day will come eventually. "

UC Mama in CT wrote on July 9, 2006 4:10 pm:
" As a Unassisted Childbirthing mama 2x over- I would like to say welcome to the club mama! "

Laura wrote on July 9, 2006 4:27 pm:
" Hooray for you Karen. Home is the best place to birth. Is it not a "step backward into the 1800's." In fact in the 1920's and 30's, as more births shifted to hospitals, the infant mortality rates ROSE. Also the infant death rates from birth injuries increased by 40-50%. In fact The British House of Commons Health Select Committee published a report in 1992 that said "The policy of encouraging all women to give birth in hospitals cannot be justified on grounds of safety... Women should be given... and opportunity for choice,... including the option, previously denied them, of having their babies at home." (according to The Thinking Woman's Guide to a Better Birth by Henci Goer.) Thanks for sharing your story! -L "

FN wrote on July 9, 2006 4:39 pm:
" It's a sad day when women can choose to go in and abort their late-term baby with a "doctor" but cannot make an educated decision how to birth their baby. When we put the future of our children in the hands of lawmakers who do not even care to look at the evidence but side with their cronies,(the ones with the money), we do a major disservice to our state. "

Anna wrote on July 9, 2006 8:42 pm:
" We in PA are blessed to have the liberty to choose. We are praying that you will also have that freedom soon. Keep up the good work!! "

laura wrote on July 9, 2006 9:05 pm:
" I just had a baby in my home in May-the MAIN reason I had my baby at home for HIS SAFETY -interventions at a normal birth can lead to long term or life ending injuries-to the baby. I personally have seen it happen to my friend and her son. Had nature been allowed to do as it saw fit he would not be disabled for the rest of his life. My birth was peaceful, I knew no one would do anything that wasn't absolutely necessary, including going to the hospital. I mean, have we forgot what hospitals are for? Should we all just live in one- incase one day some disease or injury comes your way? "

RN wrote on July 9, 2006 11:01 pm:
" HELLO CAROLINE, well let me tell you , as a person whom works with birth every day. It is NOT about safety. It is about physicians and their idea of "birth" -induction of labor, routinely breaking bags of water, and failure to progress which ends in cesarean section. Then you will not even be offered a vaginal birth after cesarean next time in this rediculous small town. If you are concerned with safety, please have your baby at home. If you come to the hospital, unless you are preterm and REALLY need us- we will certainly place you and your baby in jeapordy for physician convenience. You are safer to stay home. Sorry you have fallen for the MD propaganda rampant among Lincolnites. They will thank you with a routine episiotomy (if you are lucky enough to deliver vaginally), or a major abdominal surgery. Maybe they will use your initials on their custom plates of their new Range Rover next time. Probably not. As a nurse I whole heartedly support the efforts of the incredible nurse midwives AND lay midwives in this town. My daughter thanks them as well. Pregnancy is not a disease. Women need to trust their bodies and question their physicians, (both male and female) in this town. Both are equally as guilty of betraying birth, women, and babies. "

Michele R wrote on July 9, 2006 11:12 pm:
" One doesn't realize the blessing of midwifery unless they too have be previously traumatized by an careless, hurried M.D. You have my prayers and full support. For those of you who have never tried a midwife, go for it! I PROMISE you will never regret it! Your perinium will thank you! "

Matt in Kearney wrote on July 9, 2006 11:46 pm:
" As one of those people mentioned who drove to Wyoming and had a "home" birth in a hotel, I've been following this issue closely. Thanks so much for getting it some exposure with this article! I hope that many people will try to show up at the Board of Health's July 24 meeting and let them know that this issue is important to us, their constituency. The issue here is simple, it seems to me: We ought to have a right to choose our own approach to this very important decision. The government ought to have to defend its curtailing of our personal rights, rather than us having to beg for the basic right to make our own health-care choices. Whether or not you would desire a homebirth isn't really the question; rather, it's a question of who should make that choice--the individuals involved, or the state bureaucracy. "